Lead: Paint Makers Facing Major Legal Assault
Drawing inspiration from the recent legal assault on
tobacco, trial lawyers and politicians across the US are "gearing
up to mount a major assault" on the former makers of lead paint,
which was banned in 1978 but still poisons children
(Greenwire,
Apr. 7).
The movement "marks the revival of a battle that has faded
from public consciousness." After the government banned lead in
paint, the industry "beat back" major lawsuits and have never
faced a full trial. But the alliance between trial lawyers and
state attorneys general against the tobacco industry has
"broadened everyone's thinking about creative legal remedies,"
said Don Ryan of the DC-based Alliance to End Childhood Lead
Poisoning.
Just as the tobacco suits sought to recover Medicaid funds
used to treat sick smokers, lead paint lawsuits would likely seek
recovery of government funds spent on medical care or to remove
lead from housing.
Paint and pigment makers deny responsibility, saying they
voluntarily stopped using lead in paints in the 1950s and
supported the federal ban in 1978. Also, they say it is
impossible to affix blame because lead also exists in other
commonplace products
(Saundra Torry, Washington Post, June 10).
Meanwhile, New York Times columnist John Tierney says "lead-
poisoning lawsuits against landlords have become a booming
industry for lawyers"
(June 10).
Cincinnati Looks to New Lead Program
The Cincinnati Board of Health will receive recommendations
tonight from the city's Environmental Advisory Council to
establish a new "Preventive Lead Control Program." The advisory
group wants to see an end to the city's "historically haphazard"
approach to preventing lead poisoning among children
(Tim
Bonfield, Cincinnati Enquirer, June 10).